RCV vs VRK Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of RCV (Azimut Portföy Birinci Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and VRK (Deniz Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | RCV | VRK | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −2.82% | −2.95% |
| Daily | 0.79% | 0.64% | 0.29% |
| 1 week | 0.48% | −0.46% | 0.41% |
| 1 month | −4.36% | −2.20% | 0.20% |
| 3 months | 6.10% | 6.85% | 8.83% |
| 6 months | 14.82% | 15.62% | 16.56% |
| YTD | 29.12% | 22.89% | 27.81% |
| 1 year | 37.25% | — | 39.52% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the RCV vs VRK Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of RCV (Azimut Portföy Birinci Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and VRK (Deniz Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, RCV leads in 4 and VRK leads in 4. RCV is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; VRK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RCV leads (0.79% vs 0.64%). 1 week: RCV leads (0.48% vs −0.46%). 1 month: VRK leads (−2.20% vs −4.36%). 3 months: VRK leads (6.85% vs 6.10%). 6 months: VRK leads (15.62% vs 14.82%). YTD: RCV leads (29.12% vs 22.89%). Size (TRY): RCV leads (61.8M vs 44.6M). Investors: VRK leads (152 vs 109).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, RCV or VRK?
Year to date RCV returned 29.12% and VRK returned 22.89%; over the last year RCV returned 37.25% and VRK returned —. Over the last month RCV returned −4.36% and VRK returned −2.20%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, RCV or VRK?
As of September 28, 2026, RCV has a size of TRY 61.8M with 109 investors, while VRK has a size of TRY 44.6M with 152 investors. RCV leads in size and VRK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of RCV and VRK mean?
The CMB risk score of RCV is 4 out of 7 and that of VRK is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.