Yatırımcı.AI

RCV vs RJG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of RCV (Azimut Portföy Birinci Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and RJG (Re-Pıe Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) side by side.

RCVRJG
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

RCV vs RJG Fund Comparison
MetricRCVRJGCategory median
Daily0.79%0.57%0.29%
1 week0.48%−1.52%0.41%
1 month−4.36%−5.04%0.20%
3 months6.10%10.88%8.83%
6 months14.82%2.33%16.56%
YTD29.12%5.67%27.81%
1 year37.25%27.32%39.52%
3 years—0.00%172.10%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the RCV vs RJG comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of RCV (Azimut Portföy Birinci Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and RJG (Re-Pıe Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, RCV leads in 8 and RJG leads in 2. RCV is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RJG is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Re-Pıe Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RCV leads (0.79% vs 0.57%). 1 week: RCV leads (0.48% vs −1.52%). 1 month: RCV leads (−4.36% vs −5.04%). 3 months: RJG leads (10.88% vs 6.10%). 6 months: RCV leads (14.82% vs 2.33%). YTD: RCV leads (29.12% vs 5.67%). 1 year: RCV leads (37.25% vs 27.32%). Size (TRY): RCV leads (61.8M vs 55.2M). Investors: RJG leads (464 vs 109). Risk: RCV leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date RCV returned 29.12% and RJG returned 5.67%; over the last year RCV returned 37.25% and RJG returned 27.32%. Over the last month RCV returned −4.36% and RJG returned −5.04%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, RCV has a size of TRY 61.8M with 109 investors, while RJG has a size of TRY 55.2M with 464 investors. RCV leads in size and RJG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of RCV is 4 out of 7 and that of RJG is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.