Yatırımcı.AI

PRU vs TPP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PRU (Allbatross Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) and TPP (TEB Portföy Pusula Serbest Fon) side by side.

PRUTPP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

PRU vs TPP Fund Comparison
MetricPRUTPPCategory median
Daily0.11%−0.81%0.01%
1 week0.81%−0.05%0.30%
1 month3.57%−6.75%0.00%
3 months11.71%−1.23%3.96%
6 months25.67%9.07%8.18%
YTD44.67%23.25%15.73%
1 year58.65%49.11%20.69%
3 years280.80%225.74%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the PRU vs TPP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of PRU (Allbatross Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) and TPP (TEB Portföy Pusula Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, PRU leads in 9 and TPP leads in 1. PRU is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi; TPP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PRU leads (0.11% vs −0.81%). 1 week: PRU leads (0.81% vs −0.05%). 1 month: PRU leads (3.57% vs −6.75%). 3 months: PRU leads (11.71% vs −1.23%). 6 months: PRU leads (25.67% vs 9.07%). YTD: PRU leads (44.67% vs 23.25%). 1 year: PRU leads (58.65% vs 49.11%). 3 years: PRU leads (280.80% vs 225.74%). Size (TRY): TPP leads (1.6B vs 795.3M). Investors: PRU leads (931 vs 332).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date PRU returned 44.67% and TPP returned 23.25%; over the last year PRU returned 58.65% and TPP returned 49.11%. Over the last month PRU returned 3.57% and TPP returned −6.75%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, PRU has a size of TRY 795.3M with 931 investors, while TPP has a size of TRY 1.6B with 332 investors. TPP leads in size and PRU leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of PRU is 2 out of 7 and that of TPP is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.