PRH vs RBP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PRH (Aura Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and RBP (Re-Pie Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | PRH | RBP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
| 1 week | 0.70% | 0.71% | 0.71% |
| 1 month | 3.07% | 3.37% | 3.17% |
| 3 months | 9.96% | 10.84% | 10.01% |
| 6 months | 21.13% | 23.15% | 21.27% |
| YTD | 32.24% | 35.63% | 32.49% |
| 1 year | 48.10% | 50.53% | 46.26% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the PRH vs RBP Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of PRH (Aura Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and RBP (Re-Pie Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, PRH leads in 2 and RBP leads in 7. PRH is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Aura Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RBP is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Re-Pie Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PRH leads (0.10% vs 0.10%). 1 week: RBP leads (0.71% vs 0.70%). 1 month: RBP leads (3.37% vs 3.07%). 3 months: RBP leads (10.84% vs 9.96%). 6 months: RBP leads (23.15% vs 21.13%). YTD: RBP leads (35.63% vs 32.24%). 1 year: RBP leads (50.53% vs 48.10%). Size (TRY): PRH leads (583M vs 485M). Investors: RBP leads (677 vs 175).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, PRH or RBP?
Year to date PRH returned 32.24% and RBP returned 35.63%; over the last year PRH returned 48.10% and RBP returned 50.53%. Over the last month PRH returned 3.07% and RBP returned 3.37%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, PRH or RBP?
As of September 29, 2026, PRH has a size of TRY 583M with 175 investors, while RBP has a size of TRY 485M with 677 investors. PRH leads in size and RBP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of PRH and RBP mean?
The CMB risk score of PRH is 1 out of 7 and that of RBP is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.