Yatırımcı.AI

OBI vs TFU Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of OBI (Oyak Portföy İkinci Borçlanma Araçları (TL) Fonu) and TFU (İş Portföy Tüfeye Endeksli Borçlanma Araçları (TL) Fonu) side by side.

OBITFU
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

OBI vs TFU Fund Comparison
MetricOBITFUCategory median
Daily0.26%0.23%0.24%
1 week0.70%0.54%0.61%
1 month1.47%2.27%1.60%
3 months7.64%5.91%7.35%
6 months21.47%16.43%18.12%
YTD19.87%28.39%20.27%
1 year35.78%—35.25%
3 years168.08%—164.38%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the OBI vs TFU comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of OBI (Oyak Portföy İkinci Borçlanma Araçları (TL) Fonu) and TFU (İş Portföy Tüfeye Endeksli Borçlanma Araçları (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, OBI leads in 6 and TFU leads in 3. OBI is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Oyak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TFU is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: OBI leads (0.26% vs 0.23%). 1 week: OBI leads (0.70% vs 0.54%). 1 month: TFU leads (2.27% vs 1.47%). 3 months: OBI leads (7.64% vs 5.91%). 6 months: OBI leads (21.47% vs 16.43%). YTD: TFU leads (28.39% vs 19.87%). Size (TRY): OBI leads (240.3M vs 198.1M). Investors: TFU leads (1,089 vs 464). Risk: OBI leads (3 vs 4).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date OBI returned 19.87% and TFU returned 28.39%; over the last year OBI returned 35.78% and TFU returned —. Over the last month OBI returned 1.47% and TFU returned 2.27%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, OBI has a size of TRY 240.3M with 464 investors, while TFU has a size of TRY 198.1M with 1,089 investors. OBI leads in size and TFU leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of OBI is 3 out of 7 and that of TFU is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.