Yatırımcı.AI

EIG vs TFU Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EIG (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and TFU (İş Portföy Tüfeye Endeksli Borçlanma Araçları (TL) Fonu) side by side.

EIGTFU
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

EIG vs TFU Fund Comparison
MetricEIGTFUCategory median
Daily0.19%0.23%0.24%
1 week0.14%0.54%0.61%
1 month−0.18%2.27%1.60%
3 months4.57%5.91%7.35%
6 months16.56%16.43%18.12%
YTD15.34%28.39%20.27%
1 year28.85%—35.25%
3 years146.71%—164.38%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the EIG vs TFU comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EIG (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and TFU (İş Portföy Tüfeye Endeksli Borçlanma Araçları (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, EIG leads in 3 and TFU leads in 5. EIG is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; TFU is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: TFU leads (0.23% vs 0.19%). 1 week: TFU leads (0.54% vs 0.14%). 1 month: TFU leads (2.27% vs −0.18%). 3 months: TFU leads (5.91% vs 4.57%). 6 months: EIG leads (16.56% vs 16.43%). YTD: TFU leads (28.39% vs 15.34%). Size (TRY): EIG leads (230.6M vs 198.1M). Investors: EIG leads (16,117 vs 1,089).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date EIG returned 15.34% and TFU returned 28.39%; over the last year EIG returned 28.85% and TFU returned —. Over the last month EIG returned −0.18% and TFU returned 2.27%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, EIG has a size of TRY 230.6M with 16,117 investors, while TFU has a size of TRY 198.1M with 1,089 investors. EIG leads in size and EIG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EIG is 4 out of 7 and that of TFU is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.