Yatırımcı.AI

NZT vs UPD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and UPD (Ünlü Portföy Dördüncü Serbest (Dövız) Fon) side by side.

NZTUPD
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

NZT vs UPD Fund Comparison
MetricNZTUPDCategory median
Daily0.29%−0.24%0.19%
1 week0.69%−0.43%0.42%
1 month3.17%−0.68%0.94%
3 months9.86%4.26%5.89%
6 months21.32%11.10%12.86%
YTD31.94%14.02%18.07%
1 year45.79%22.63%24.44%
3 years260.51%107.63%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the NZT vs UPD comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and UPD (Ünlü Portföy Dördüncü Serbest (Dövız) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, NZT leads in 11 and UPD leads in 0. NZT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; UPD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ünlü Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NZT leads (0.29% vs −0.24%). 1 week: NZT leads (0.69% vs −0.43%). 1 month: NZT leads (3.17% vs −0.68%). 3 months: NZT leads (9.86% vs 4.26%). 6 months: NZT leads (21.32% vs 11.10%). YTD: NZT leads (31.94% vs 14.02%). 1 year: NZT leads (45.79% vs 22.63%). 3 years: NZT leads (260.51% vs 107.63%). Size (TRY): NZT leads (2.4B vs 2.4B). Investors: NZT leads (334 vs 223). Risk: NZT leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date NZT returned 31.94% and UPD returned 14.02%; over the last year NZT returned 45.79% and UPD returned 22.63%. Over the last month NZT returned 3.17% and UPD returned −0.68%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, NZT has a size of TRY 2.4B with 334 investors, while UPD has a size of TRY 2.4B with 223 investors. NZT leads in size and NZT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of NZT is 2 out of 7 and that of UPD is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.