Yatırımcı.AI

NZT vs TPJ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and TPJ (Teb Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

NZTTPJ
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

NZT vs TPJ Fund Comparison
MetricNZTTPJCategory median
Daily0.29%0.12%0.19%
1 week0.69%0.37%0.42%
1 month3.17%1.43%0.94%
3 months9.86%5.94%5.89%
6 months21.32%13.99%12.86%
YTD31.94%16.12%18.07%
1 year45.79%23.62%24.44%
3 years260.51%125.25%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the NZT vs TPJ comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and TPJ (Teb Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, NZT leads in 9 and TPJ leads in 2. NZT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TPJ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Teb Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NZT leads (0.29% vs 0.12%). 1 week: NZT leads (0.69% vs 0.37%). 1 month: NZT leads (3.17% vs 1.43%). 3 months: NZT leads (9.86% vs 5.94%). 6 months: NZT leads (21.32% vs 13.99%). YTD: NZT leads (31.94% vs 16.12%). 1 year: NZT leads (45.79% vs 23.62%). 3 years: NZT leads (260.51% vs 125.25%). Size (TRY): NZT leads (2.4B vs 2.3B). Investors: TPJ leads (1,414 vs 334). Risk: TPJ leads (0 vs 2).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date NZT returned 31.94% and TPJ returned 16.12%; over the last year NZT returned 45.79% and TPJ returned 23.62%. Over the last month NZT returned 3.17% and TPJ returned 1.43%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, NZT has a size of TRY 2.4B with 334 investors, while TPJ has a size of TRY 2.3B with 1,414 investors. NZT leads in size and TPJ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of NZT is 2 out of 7 and that of TPJ is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.