NUB vs RS1 Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NUB (Nurol Portföy Beşinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and RS1 (Rota Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | NUB | RS1 | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.19% | 0.31% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | −0.31% | 0.72% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −0.37% | 3.27% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 5.88% | 10.18% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 10.44% | 22.16% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 13.16% | 33.46% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 18.66% | 48.18% | 24.44% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the NUB vs RS1 comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of NUB (Nurol Portföy Beşinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and RS1 (Rota Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, NUB leads in 3 and RS1 leads in 7. NUB is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RS1 is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RS1 leads (0.31% vs 0.19%). 1 week: RS1 leads (0.72% vs −0.31%). 1 month: RS1 leads (3.27% vs −0.37%). 3 months: RS1 leads (10.18% vs 5.88%). 6 months: RS1 leads (22.16% vs 10.44%). YTD: RS1 leads (33.46% vs 13.16%). 1 year: RS1 leads (48.18% vs 18.66%). Size (TRY): NUB leads (1B vs 1B). Investors: NUB leads (611 vs 118). Risk: NUB leads (0 vs 2).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, NUB or RS1?
Year to date NUB returned 13.16% and RS1 returned 33.46%; over the last year NUB returned 18.66% and RS1 returned 48.18%. Over the last month NUB returned −0.37% and RS1 returned 3.27%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, NUB or RS1?
As of September 28, 2026, NUB has a size of TRY 1B with 611 investors, while RS1 has a size of TRY 1B with 118 investors. NUB leads in size and NUB leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of NUB and RS1 mean?
The CMB risk score of NUB is 0 out of 7 and that of RS1 is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.