Yatırımcı.AI

NBZ vs ZCD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NBZ (Neo Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ZCD (Ziraat Portföy Altıncı Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

NBZZCD
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

NBZ vs ZCD Fund Comparison
MetricNBZZCDCategory median
Daily0.06%0.08%0.01%
1 week0.40%−1.08%0.30%
1 month1.86%−12.71%0.00%
3 months6.05%−10.48%3.96%
6 months12.57%−9.98%8.18%
YTD19.12%−3.43%15.73%
1 year23.31%3.94%20.69%
3 years100.12%182.77%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the NBZ vs ZCD Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of NBZ (Neo Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ZCD (Ziraat Portföy Altıncı Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, NBZ leads in 6 and ZCD leads in 4. NBZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZCD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZCD leads (0.08% vs 0.06%). 1 week: NBZ leads (0.40% vs −1.08%). 1 month: NBZ leads (1.86% vs −12.71%). 3 months: NBZ leads (6.05% vs −10.48%). 6 months: NBZ leads (12.57% vs −9.98%). YTD: NBZ leads (19.12% vs −3.43%). 1 year: NBZ leads (23.31% vs 3.94%). 3 years: ZCD leads (182.77% vs 100.12%). Size (TRY): ZCD leads (1.1B vs 1B). Investors: ZCD leads (369 vs 160).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date NBZ returned 19.12% and ZCD returned −3.43%; over the last year NBZ returned 23.31% and ZCD returned 3.94%. Over the last month NBZ returned 1.86% and ZCD returned −12.71%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, NBZ has a size of TRY 1B with 160 investors, while ZCD has a size of TRY 1.1B with 369 investors. ZCD leads in size and ZCD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of NBZ is 6 out of 7 and that of ZCD is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.