Yatırımcı.AI

MTD vs SSK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MTD (BV Portföy Malzeme Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and SSK (Deniz Portföy Sağlık Sektörü Değişken Fon) side by side.

MTDSSK
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

MTD vs SSK Fund Comparison
MetricMTDSSKCategory median
Daily0.74%−0.08%0.03%
1 week0.70%1.07%0.83%
1 month−8.05%6.66%−1.16%
3 months−14.71%8.93%−0.11%
6 months−24.02%26.16%0.00%
YTD2.86%33.63%22.14%
1 year0.00%43.57%29.37%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the MTD vs SSK Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of MTD (BV Portföy Malzeme Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and SSK (Deniz Portföy Sağlık Sektörü Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, MTD leads in 2 and SSK leads in 7. MTD is a Variable Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SSK is a Variable Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MTD leads (0.74% vs −0.08%). 1 week: SSK leads (1.07% vs 0.70%). 1 month: SSK leads (6.66% vs −8.05%). 3 months: SSK leads (8.93% vs −14.71%). 6 months: SSK leads (26.16% vs −24.02%). YTD: SSK leads (33.63% vs 2.86%). 1 year: SSK leads (43.57% vs 0.00%). Size (TRY): SSK leads (46.9M vs 44.7M). Investors: MTD leads (984 vs 550).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date MTD returned 2.86% and SSK returned 33.63%; over the last year MTD returned 0.00% and SSK returned 43.57%. Over the last month MTD returned −8.05% and SSK returned 6.66%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, MTD has a size of TRY 44.7M with 984 investors, while SSK has a size of TRY 46.9M with 550 investors. SSK leads in size and MTD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of MTD is 5 out of 7 and that of SSK is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.