Yatırımcı.AI

MBR vs TOT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MBR (MT Portföy Birinci Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) and TOT (TEB Portföy Özel Sektör Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) side by side.

MBRTOT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

MBR vs TOT Fund Comparison
MetricMBRTOTCategory median
Daily0.09%0.10%0.07%
1 week0.54%0.68%0.57%
1 month−3.46%2.95%2.46%
3 months3.01%9.52%9.39%
6 months15.56%20.36%16.05%
YTD36.12%34.95%25.12%
1 year46.36%44.93%38.90%
3 years—233.77%178.72%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the MBR vs TOT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of MBR (MT Portföy Birinci Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) and TOT (TEB Portföy Özel Sektör Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, MBR leads in 2 and TOT leads in 8. MBR is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by MT Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TOT is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: TOT leads (0.10% vs 0.09%). 1 week: TOT leads (0.68% vs 0.54%). 1 month: TOT leads (2.95% vs −3.46%). 3 months: TOT leads (9.52% vs 3.01%). 6 months: TOT leads (20.36% vs 15.56%). YTD: MBR leads (36.12% vs 34.95%). 1 year: MBR leads (46.36% vs 44.93%). Size (TRY): TOT leads (115.5M vs 100.1M). Investors: TOT leads (622 vs 190). Risk: TOT leads (1 vs 3).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date MBR returned 36.12% and TOT returned 34.95%; over the last year MBR returned 46.36% and TOT returned 44.93%. Over the last month MBR returned −3.46% and TOT returned 2.95%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, MBR has a size of TRY 100.1M with 190 investors, while TOT has a size of TRY 115.5M with 622 investors. TOT leads in size and TOT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of MBR is 3 out of 7 and that of TOT is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.