Yatırımcı.AI

LLA vs MT1 Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of LLA (Allbatross Portföy Aydın Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and MT1 (MT Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

LLAMT1
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

LLA vs MT1 Fund Comparison
MetricLLAMT1Category median
Today (est.)1.57%—1.08%
Daily−1.13%−0.10%0.06%
1 week2.71%−0.14%0.56%
1 month−8.77%1.38%1.84%
3 months−24.85%4.47%3.29%
6 months−36.24%10.76%7.90%
YTD−28.76%16.85%17.53%
1 year−54.71%21.86%21.48%
3 years−33.90%—105.66%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 12, 2026, 12:24.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the LLA vs MT1 Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of LLA (Allbatross Portföy Aydın Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and MT1 (MT Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, LLA leads in 2 and MT1 leads in 7. LLA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi; MT1 is a Hedge Fund fund managed by MT Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MT1 leads (−0.10% vs −1.13%). 1 week: LLA leads (2.71% vs −0.14%). 1 month: MT1 leads (1.38% vs −8.77%). 3 months: MT1 leads (4.47% vs −24.85%). 6 months: MT1 leads (10.76% vs −36.24%). YTD: MT1 leads (16.85% vs −28.76%). 1 year: MT1 leads (21.86% vs −54.71%). Size (TRY): MT1 leads (9.8M vs 9.7M). Investors: LLA leads (597 vs 14).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date LLA returned −28.76% and MT1 returned 16.85%; over the last year LLA returned −54.71% and MT1 returned 21.86%. Over the last month LLA returned −8.77% and MT1 returned 1.38%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, LLA has a size of TRY 9.7M with 597 investors, while MT1 has a size of TRY 9.8M with 14 investors. MT1 leads in size and LLA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of LLA is 7 out of 7 and that of MT1 is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.