Yatırımcı.AI

KZL vs TCA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KZL (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) and TCA (Ziraat Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) side by side.

KZLTCA
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

KZL vs TCA Fund Comparison
MetricKZLTCACategory median
Daily0.59%0.67%0.29%
1 week−1.79%−1.71%0.41%
1 month−5.12%−5.19%0.20%
3 months10.99%8.28%8.83%
6 months3.26%−3.31%16.56%
YTD10.41%−3.53%27.81%
1 year31.18%16.43%39.52%
3 years312.90%255.25%172.10%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the KZL vs TCA comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KZL (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) and TCA (Ziraat Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, KZL leads in 9 and TCA leads in 2. KZL is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TCA is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: TCA leads (0.67% vs 0.59%). 1 week: TCA leads (−1.71% vs −1.79%). 1 month: KZL leads (−5.12% vs −5.19%). 3 months: KZL leads (10.99% vs 8.28%). 6 months: KZL leads (3.26% vs −3.31%). YTD: KZL leads (10.41% vs −3.53%). 1 year: KZL leads (31.18% vs 16.43%). 3 years: KZL leads (312.90% vs 255.25%). Size (TRY): KZL leads (86.5B vs 13.4B). Investors: KZL leads (63,612 vs 44,197). Risk: KZL leads (0 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date KZL returned 10.41% and TCA returned −3.53%; over the last year KZL returned 31.18% and TCA returned 16.43%. Over the last month KZL returned −5.12% and TCA returned −5.19%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, KZL has a size of TRY 86.5B with 63,612 investors, while TCA has a size of TRY 13.4B with 44,197 investors. KZL leads in size and KZL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KZL is 0 out of 7 and that of TCA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.