Yatırımcı.AI

KTT vs YBR Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KTT (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Dördüncü Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and YBR (İş Portföy Yirmibirinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

KTTYBR
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KTT vs YBR Fund Comparison
MetricKTTYBRCategory median
Daily0.07%−0.11%0.01%
1 week0.34%−0.35%0.30%
1 month1.63%−0.39%0.00%
3 months5.33%2.94%3.96%
6 months11.18%8.01%8.18%
YTD17.39%15.74%15.73%
1 year21.66%23.00%20.69%
3 years116.69%—105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KTT vs YBR Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KTT (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Dördüncü Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and YBR (İş Portföy Yirmibirinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, KTT leads in 6 and YBR leads in 3. KTT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YBR is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KTT leads (0.07% vs −0.11%). 1 week: KTT leads (0.34% vs −0.35%). 1 month: KTT leads (1.63% vs −0.39%). 3 months: KTT leads (5.33% vs 2.94%). 6 months: KTT leads (11.18% vs 8.01%). YTD: KTT leads (17.39% vs 15.74%). 1 year: YBR leads (23.00% vs 21.66%). Size (TRY): YBR leads (4.9B vs 4.6B). Investors: YBR leads (2,155 vs 1,274).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KTT returned 17.39% and YBR returned 15.74%; over the last year KTT returned 21.66% and YBR returned 23.00%. Over the last month KTT returned 1.63% and YBR returned −0.39%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, KTT has a size of TRY 4.6B with 1,274 investors, while YBR has a size of TRY 4.9B with 2,155 investors. YBR leads in size and YBR leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KTT is — out of 7 and that of YBR is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.