Yatırımcı.AI

KTT vs MT2 Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KTT (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Dördüncü Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and MT2 (Mt Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

KTTMT2
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KTT vs MT2 Fund Comparison
MetricKTTMT2Category median
Daily0.02%0.28%0.19%
1 week0.06%0.60%0.42%
1 month0.79%3.21%0.94%
3 months5.04%10.48%5.89%
6 months12.19%24.45%12.86%
YTD15.25%38.94%18.07%
1 year21.77%0.00%24.44%
3 years117.95%—111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KTT vs MT2 Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KTT (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Dördüncü Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and MT2 (Mt Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KTT leads in 4 and MT2 leads in 6. KTT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MT2 is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Mt Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MT2 leads (0.28% vs 0.02%). 1 week: MT2 leads (0.60% vs 0.06%). 1 month: MT2 leads (3.21% vs 0.79%). 3 months: MT2 leads (10.48% vs 5.04%). 6 months: MT2 leads (24.45% vs 12.19%). YTD: MT2 leads (38.94% vs 15.25%). 1 year: KTT leads (21.77% vs 0.00%). Size (TRY): KTT leads (5.1B vs 4.8B). Investors: KTT leads (1,369 vs 592). Risk: KTT leads (0 vs 2).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KTT returned 15.25% and MT2 returned 38.94%; over the last year KTT returned 21.77% and MT2 returned 0.00%. Over the last month KTT returned 0.79% and MT2 returned 3.21%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, KTT has a size of TRY 5.1B with 1,369 investors, while MT2 has a size of TRY 4.8B with 592 investors. KTT leads in size and KTT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KTT is 0 out of 7 and that of MT2 is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.