Yatırımcı.AI

KTT vs NCS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KTT (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Dördüncü Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NCS (Nurol Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

KTTNCS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KTT vs NCS Fund Comparison
MetricKTTNCSCategory median
Daily0.02%0.09%0.19%
1 week0.06%0.49%0.42%
1 month0.79%1.99%0.94%
3 months5.04%6.34%5.89%
6 months12.19%12.85%12.86%
YTD15.25%17.98%18.07%
1 year21.77%23.61%24.44%
3 years117.95%116.19%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KTT vs NCS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KTT (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Dördüncü Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NCS (Nurol Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KTT leads in 2 and NCS leads in 8. KTT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NCS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NCS leads (0.09% vs 0.02%). 1 week: NCS leads (0.49% vs 0.06%). 1 month: NCS leads (1.99% vs 0.79%). 3 months: NCS leads (6.34% vs 5.04%). 6 months: NCS leads (12.85% vs 12.19%). YTD: NCS leads (17.98% vs 15.25%). 1 year: NCS leads (23.61% vs 21.77%). 3 years: KTT leads (117.95% vs 116.19%). Size (TRY): NCS leads (5.1B vs 5.1B). Investors: KTT leads (1,369 vs 1,238).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KTT returned 15.25% and NCS returned 17.98%; over the last year KTT returned 21.77% and NCS returned 23.61%. Over the last month KTT returned 0.79% and NCS returned 1.99%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, KTT has a size of TRY 5.1B with 1,369 investors, while NCS has a size of TRY 5.1B with 1,238 investors. NCS leads in size and KTT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KTT is 0 out of 7 and that of NCS is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.