Yatırımcı.AI

KSU vs ZPF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KSU (Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Sürdürülebilirlik Katılım Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and ZPF (Ziraat Portföy Katılım Fonu (Döviz)) side by side.

KSUZPF
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KSU vs ZPF Fund Comparison
MetricKSUZPFCategory median
Daily−2.17%0.21%−0.18%
1 week−0.69%0.54%0.13%
1 month−5.32%2.58%−0.64%
3 months−0.17%6.25%3.73%
6 months5.81%12.91%9.17%
YTD27.56%19.26%26.58%
1 year30.21%23.52%30.98%
3 years14.87%123.01%166.05%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KSU vs ZPF Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KSU (Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Sürdürülebilirlik Katılım Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and ZPF (Ziraat Portföy Katılım Fonu (Döviz)) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, KSU leads in 5 and ZPF leads in 6. KSU is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; ZPF is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZPF leads (0.21% vs −2.17%). 1 week: ZPF leads (0.54% vs −0.69%). 1 month: ZPF leads (2.58% vs −5.32%). 3 months: ZPF leads (6.25% vs −0.17%). 6 months: ZPF leads (12.91% vs 5.81%). YTD: KSU leads (27.56% vs 19.26%). 1 year: KSU leads (30.21% vs 23.52%). 3 years: ZPF leads (123.01% vs 14.87%). Size (TRY): KSU leads (1.1B vs 894M). Investors: KSU leads (16,477 vs 3,403). Risk: KSU leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KSU returned 27.56% and ZPF returned 19.26%; over the last year KSU returned 30.21% and ZPF returned 23.52%. Over the last month KSU returned −5.32% and ZPF returned 2.58%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, KSU has a size of TRY 1.1B with 16,477 investors, while ZPF has a size of TRY 894M with 3,403 investors. KSU leads in size and KSU leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KSU is 5 out of 7 and that of ZPF is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.