Yatırımcı.AI

KSK vs TLK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KSK (Azimut Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) and TLK (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) side by side.

KSKTLK
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

KSK vs TLK Fund Comparison
MetricKSKTLKCategory median
Daily0.29%0.29%0.29%
1 week0.70%0.65%0.41%
1 month3.21%3.10%0.20%
3 months10.00%9.85%8.83%
6 months21.59%21.02%16.56%
YTD32.44%31.38%27.81%
1 year46.04%44.93%39.52%
3 years60.02%—172.10%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the KSK vs TLK comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KSK (Azimut Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) and TLK (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KSK leads in 8 and TLK leads in 2. KSK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TLK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Aktıf Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KSK leads (0.29% vs 0.29%). 1 week: KSK leads (0.70% vs 0.65%). 1 month: KSK leads (3.21% vs 3.10%). 3 months: KSK leads (10.00% vs 9.85%). 6 months: KSK leads (21.59% vs 21.02%). YTD: KSK leads (32.44% vs 31.38%). 1 year: KSK leads (46.04% vs 44.93%). Size (TRY): KSK leads (3.8B vs 3B). Investors: TLK leads (1,123 vs 583). Risk: TLK leads (1 vs 2).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date KSK returned 32.44% and TLK returned 31.38%; over the last year KSK returned 46.04% and TLK returned 44.93%. Over the last month KSK returned 3.21% and TLK returned 3.10%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, KSK has a size of TRY 3.8B with 583 investors, while TLK has a size of TRY 3B with 1,123 investors. KSK leads in size and TLK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KSK is 2 out of 7 and that of TLK is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.