Yatırımcı.AI

KCV vs TLK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KCV (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and TLK (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) side by side.

KCVTLK
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

KCV vs TLK Fund Comparison
MetricKCVTLKCategory median
Daily0.54%0.29%0.29%
1 week−0.26%0.65%0.41%
1 month−0.06%3.10%0.20%
3 months5.31%9.85%8.83%
6 months21.52%21.02%16.56%
YTD35.83%31.38%27.81%
1 year50.37%44.93%39.52%
3 years229.63%—172.10%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the KCV vs TLK comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KCV (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and TLK (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KCV leads in 5 and TLK leads in 5. KCV is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TLK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Aktıf Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KCV leads (0.54% vs 0.29%). 1 week: TLK leads (0.65% vs −0.26%). 1 month: TLK leads (3.10% vs −0.06%). 3 months: TLK leads (9.85% vs 5.31%). 6 months: KCV leads (21.52% vs 21.02%). YTD: KCV leads (35.83% vs 31.38%). 1 year: KCV leads (50.37% vs 44.93%). Size (TRY): TLK leads (3B vs 2.7B). Investors: KCV leads (13,037 vs 1,123). Risk: TLK leads (1 vs 2).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date KCV returned 35.83% and TLK returned 31.38%; over the last year KCV returned 50.37% and TLK returned 44.93%. Over the last month KCV returned −0.06% and TLK returned 3.10%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, KCV has a size of TRY 2.7B with 13,037 investors, while TLK has a size of TRY 3B with 1,123 investors. TLK leads in size and KCV leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KCV is 2 out of 7 and that of TLK is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.