Yatırımcı.AI

KPI vs KZL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KPI (İş Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) and KZL (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) side by side.

KPIKZL
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

KPI vs KZL Fund Comparison
MetricKPIKZLCategory median
Daily0.29%0.59%0.29%
1 week0.67%−1.79%0.41%
1 month3.08%−5.12%0.20%
3 months9.79%10.99%8.83%
6 months21.14%3.26%16.56%
YTD31.55%10.41%27.81%
1 year44.95%31.18%39.52%
3 years—312.90%172.10%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the KPI vs KZL comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KPI (İş Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) and KZL (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KPI leads in 5 and KZL leads in 5. KPI is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KZL is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KZL leads (0.59% vs 0.29%). 1 week: KPI leads (0.67% vs −1.79%). 1 month: KPI leads (3.08% vs −5.12%). 3 months: KZL leads (10.99% vs 9.79%). 6 months: KPI leads (21.14% vs 3.26%). YTD: KPI leads (31.55% vs 10.41%). 1 year: KPI leads (44.95% vs 31.18%). Size (TRY): KZL leads (86.5B vs 6.9B). Investors: KZL leads (63,612 vs 7,494). Risk: KZL leads (0 vs 1).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date KPI returned 31.55% and KZL returned 10.41%; over the last year KPI returned 44.95% and KZL returned 31.18%. Over the last month KPI returned 3.08% and KZL returned −5.12%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, KPI has a size of TRY 6.9B with 7,494 investors, while KZL has a size of TRY 86.5B with 63,612 investors. KZL leads in size and KZL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KPI is 1 out of 7 and that of KZL is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.