Yatırımcı.AI

KML vs VGD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KML (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Kıymetli Madenler Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and VGD (Türkiye Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

KMLVGD
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

KML vs VGD Fund Comparison
MetricKMLVGD
Daily−0.45%0.39%
1 week−0.33%−1.24%
1 month−6.01%−4.79%
3 months8.38%11.36%
6 months3.04%3.66%
YTD7.62%9.10%
1 year43.35%36.32%
3 years—322.11%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Related pages

About the KML vs VGD comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KML (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Kıymetli Madenler Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and VGD (Türkiye Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KML leads in 3 and VGD leads in 7. KML is a Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; VGD is a Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Türkiye Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: VGD leads (0.39% vs −0.45%). 1 week: KML leads (−0.33% vs −1.24%). 1 month: VGD leads (−4.79% vs −6.01%). 3 months: VGD leads (11.36% vs 8.38%). 6 months: VGD leads (3.66% vs 3.04%). YTD: VGD leads (9.10% vs 7.62%). 1 year: KML leads (43.35% vs 36.32%). Size (TRY): VGD leads (21B vs 17.9B). Investors: VGD leads (292,783 vs 185,848). Risk: KML leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date KML returned 7.62% and VGD returned 9.10%; over the last year KML returned 43.35% and VGD returned 36.32%. Over the last month KML returned −6.01% and VGD returned −4.79%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, KML has a size of TRY 17.9B with 185,848 investors, while VGD has a size of TRY 21B with 292,783 investors. VGD leads in size and VGD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KML is 5 out of 7 and that of VGD is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.