Yatırımcı.AI

KIB vs OTM Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KIB (Trive Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and OTM (Azimut Portföy Otomotiv Sektörü Değişken Fon) side by side.

KIBOTM
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KIB vs OTM Fund Comparison
MetricKIBOTMCategory median
Daily0.46%−0.07%0.03%
1 week2.51%1.03%0.83%
1 month−9.33%−0.51%−1.16%
3 months−10.95%1.47%−0.11%
6 months−9.41%−3.73%0.00%
YTD4.82%2.17%22.14%
1 year5.66%4.19%29.37%
3 years123.10%—154.49%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KIB vs OTM Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KIB (Trive Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and OTM (Azimut Portföy Otomotiv Sektörü Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, KIB leads in 5 and OTM leads in 4. KIB is a Variable Fund fund managed by Trive Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; OTM is a Variable Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KIB leads (0.46% vs −0.07%). 1 week: KIB leads (2.51% vs 1.03%). 1 month: OTM leads (−0.51% vs −9.33%). 3 months: OTM leads (1.47% vs −10.95%). 6 months: OTM leads (−3.73% vs −9.41%). YTD: KIB leads (4.82% vs 2.17%). 1 year: KIB leads (5.66% vs 4.19%). Size (TRY): OTM leads (14.2M vs 7.7M). Investors: KIB leads (889 vs 63).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KIB returned 4.82% and OTM returned 2.17%; over the last year KIB returned 5.66% and OTM returned 4.19%. Over the last month KIB returned −9.33% and OTM returned −0.51%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, KIB has a size of TRY 7.7M with 889 investors, while OTM has a size of TRY 14.2M with 63 investors. OTM leads in size and KIB leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KIB is 6 out of 7 and that of OTM is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.