Yatırımcı.AI

KCL vs RBK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KCL (Kare Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and RBK (Albaraka Portföy Katılım Fonu) side by side.

KCLRBK
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KCL vs RBK Fund Comparison
MetricKCLRBKCategory median
Daily−1.21%0.07%−0.60%
1 week−2.22%0.37%−0.86%
1 month−3.37%1.81%−0.33%
3 months−4.72%6.63%4.42%
6 months−1.50%13.89%12.01%
YTD19.99%20.85%28.30%
1 year25.97%26.81%34.68%
3 years—136.16%158.22%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KCL vs RBK Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KCL (Kare Portföy Çoklu Varlık Katılım Fonu) and RBK (Albaraka Portföy Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KCL leads in 0 and RBK leads in 10. KCL is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RBK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Albaraka Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RBK leads (0.07% vs −1.21%). 1 week: RBK leads (0.37% vs −2.22%). 1 month: RBK leads (1.81% vs −3.37%). 3 months: RBK leads (6.63% vs −4.72%). 6 months: RBK leads (13.89% vs −1.50%). YTD: RBK leads (20.85% vs 19.99%). 1 year: RBK leads (26.81% vs 25.97%). Size (TRY): RBK leads (29.1M vs 10M). Investors: RBK leads (1,066 vs 129). Risk: RBK leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KCL returned 19.99% and RBK returned 20.85%; over the last year KCL returned 25.97% and RBK returned 26.81%. Over the last month KCL returned −3.37% and RBK returned 1.81%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, KCL has a size of TRY 10M with 129 investors, while RBK has a size of TRY 29.1M with 1,066 investors. RBK leads in size and RBK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KCL is 6 out of 7 and that of RBK is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.