JUP vs NSK Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of JUP (Aura Portföy Jüpiter Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NSK (Neo Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | JUP | NSK | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.14% | 0.08% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | 0.52% | 0.57% | 0.44% |
| 1 month | 1.08% | 2.64% | 0.38% |
| 3 months | 4.25% | 10.56% | 3.95% |
| 6 months | 9.60% | 21.20% | 8.45% |
| YTD | 13.74% | 37.72% | 16.06% |
| 1 year | 12.22% | 45.99% | 20.98% |
| 3 years | — | 261.92% | 107.86% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the JUP vs NSK Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of JUP (Aura Portföy Jüpiter Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NSK (Neo Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, JUP leads in 1 and NSK leads in 9. JUP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aura Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NSK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: NSK leads (0.08% vs −0.14%). 1 week: NSK leads (0.57% vs 0.52%). 1 month: NSK leads (2.64% vs 1.08%). 3 months: NSK leads (10.56% vs 4.25%). 6 months: NSK leads (21.20% vs 9.60%). YTD: NSK leads (37.72% vs 13.74%). 1 year: NSK leads (45.99% vs 12.22%). Size (TRY): JUP leads (45.3M vs 43.7M). Investors: NSK leads (70 vs 37). Risk: NSK leads (3 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, JUP or NSK?
Year to date JUP returned 13.74% and NSK returned 37.72%; over the last year JUP returned 12.22% and NSK returned 45.99%. Over the last month JUP returned 1.08% and NSK returned 2.64%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, JUP or NSK?
As of October 22, 2026, JUP has a size of TRY 45.3M with 37 investors, while NSK has a size of TRY 43.7M with 70 investors. JUP leads in size and NSK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of JUP and NSK mean?
The CMB risk score of JUP is 6 out of 7 and that of NSK is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.