IZB vs NKA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IZB (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) and NKA (Neo Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | IZB | NKA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.06% | 0.07% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | −7.50% | 0.42% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −11.14% | 1.75% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | −3.22% | 5.67% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 17.91% | 11.43% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 26.37% | 15.95% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 33.85% | 20.73% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | 128.18% | — | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the IZB vs NKA comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of IZB (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) and NKA (Neo Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, IZB leads in 5 and NKA leads in 5. IZB is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NKA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: NKA leads (0.07% vs 0.06%). 1 week: NKA leads (0.42% vs −7.50%). 1 month: NKA leads (1.75% vs −11.14%). 3 months: NKA leads (5.67% vs −3.22%). 6 months: IZB leads (17.91% vs 11.43%). YTD: IZB leads (26.37% vs 15.95%). 1 year: IZB leads (33.85% vs 20.73%). Size (TRY): IZB leads (133.9M vs 131.4M). Investors: IZB leads (45 vs 10). Risk: NKA leads (3 vs 5).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, IZB or NKA?
Year to date IZB returned 26.37% and NKA returned 15.95%; over the last year IZB returned 33.85% and NKA returned 20.73%. Over the last month IZB returned −11.14% and NKA returned 1.75%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, IZB or NKA?
As of September 28, 2026, IZB has a size of TRY 133.9M with 45 investors, while NKA has a size of TRY 131.4M with 10 investors. IZB leads in size and IZB leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of IZB and NKA mean?
The CMB risk score of IZB is 5 out of 7 and that of NKA is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.