IAR vs NKA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IAR (İstanbul Portföy Dördüncü Serbest Fon) and NKA (Neo Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | IAR | NKA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −1.90% | — | −1.90% |
| Daily | −0.23% | 0.07% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | −1.92% | 0.42% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −6.48% | 1.75% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | −13.82% | 5.67% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 5.21% | 11.43% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 1.62% | 15.95% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 6.93% | 20.73% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | 78.67% | — | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the IAR vs NKA comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of IAR (İstanbul Portföy Dördüncü Serbest Fon) and NKA (Neo Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, IAR leads in 1 and NKA leads in 9. IAR is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NKA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: NKA leads (0.07% vs −0.23%). 1 week: NKA leads (0.42% vs −1.92%). 1 month: NKA leads (1.75% vs −6.48%). 3 months: NKA leads (5.67% vs −13.82%). 6 months: NKA leads (11.43% vs 5.21%). YTD: NKA leads (15.95% vs 1.62%). 1 year: NKA leads (20.73% vs 6.93%). Size (TRY): NKA leads (131.4M vs 130M). Investors: IAR leads (13 vs 10). Risk: NKA leads (3 vs 6).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, IAR or NKA?
Year to date IAR returned 1.62% and NKA returned 15.95%; over the last year IAR returned 6.93% and NKA returned 20.73%. Over the last month IAR returned −6.48% and NKA returned 1.75%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, IAR or NKA?
As of September 28, 2026, IAR has a size of TRY 130M with 13 investors, while NKA has a size of TRY 131.4M with 10 investors. NKA leads in size and IAR leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of IAR and NKA mean?
The CMB risk score of IAR is 6 out of 7 and that of NKA is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.