IRV vs RDF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IRV (İstanbul Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and RDF (Rota Portföy Dokuzuncu Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | IRV | RDF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −0.21% | — | −0.15% |
| Daily | −0.09% | −2.20% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | 0.40% | −3.06% | 0.45% |
| 1 month | 2.88% | −6.00% | 0.38% |
| 3 months | 10.29% | −7.86% | 3.95% |
| 6 months | 18.85% | −5.61% | 8.45% |
| YTD | 32.21% | 15.20% | 16.06% |
| 1 year | 40.61% | 34.54% | 20.98% |
| 3 years | 203.83% | −7.19% | 107.86% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the IRV vs RDF Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of IRV (İstanbul Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and RDF (Rota Portföy Dokuzuncu Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, IRV leads in 10 and RDF leads in 1. IRV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RDF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: IRV leads (−0.09% vs −2.20%). 1 week: IRV leads (0.40% vs −3.06%). 1 month: IRV leads (2.88% vs −6.00%). 3 months: IRV leads (10.29% vs −7.86%). 6 months: IRV leads (18.85% vs −5.61%). YTD: IRV leads (32.21% vs 15.20%). 1 year: IRV leads (40.61% vs 34.54%). 3 years: IRV leads (203.83% vs −7.19%). Size (TRY): IRV leads (265.3M vs 265.1M). Investors: RDF leads (389 vs 63). Risk: IRV leads (3 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, IRV or RDF?
Year to date IRV returned 32.21% and RDF returned 15.20%; over the last year IRV returned 40.61% and RDF returned 34.54%. Over the last month IRV returned 2.88% and RDF returned −6.00%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, IRV or RDF?
As of October 22, 2026, IRV has a size of TRY 265.3M with 63 investors, while RDF has a size of TRY 265.1M with 389 investors. IRV leads in size and RDF leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of IRV and RDF mean?
The CMB risk score of IRV is 3 out of 7 and that of RDF is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.