Yatırımcı.AI

IML vs SAS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IML (İş Portföy Model Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and SAS (Ak Portföy Sabancı Topluluğu Şirketleri Endeksi Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.

IMLSAS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IML vs SAS Fund Comparison
MetricIMLSASCategory median
Today (est.)−0.79%0.13%−1.12%
Daily−2.00%−0.90%−1.77%
1 week−2.04%−2.29%−2.74%
1 month−6.32%−7.22%−7.45%
3 months−4.74%−7.50%−4.07%
6 months7.86%−1.83%6.56%
YTD18.41%7.43%18.36%
1 year24.06%12.50%19.84%
3 years—33.61%91.52%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 29, 2026, 15:19.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IML vs SAS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IML (İş Portföy Model Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and SAS (Ak Portföy Sabancı Topluluğu Şirketleri Endeksi Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, IML leads in 7 and SAS leads in 4. IML is a Stock Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SAS is a Stock Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Today (est.): SAS leads (0.13% vs −0.79%). Daily: SAS leads (−0.90% vs −2.00%). 1 week: IML leads (−2.04% vs −2.29%). 1 month: IML leads (−6.32% vs −7.22%). 3 months: IML leads (−4.74% vs −7.50%). 6 months: IML leads (7.86% vs −1.83%). YTD: IML leads (18.41% vs 7.43%). 1 year: IML leads (24.06% vs 12.50%). Size (TRY): IML leads (820M vs 772.6M). Investors: SAS leads (39,208 vs 3,888). Risk: SAS leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IML returned 18.41% and SAS returned 7.43%; over the last year IML returned 24.06% and SAS returned 12.50%. Over the last month IML returned −6.32% and SAS returned −7.22%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, IML has a size of TRY 820M with 3,888 investors, while SAS has a size of TRY 772.6M with 39,208 investors. IML leads in size and SAS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IML is 6 out of 7 and that of SAS is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.