Yatırımcı.AI

IJT vs YPF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IJT (İş Portföy Tarım Serbest Fon) and YPF (Yapı Kredi Portföy Alfa Serbest Fon) side by side.

IJTYPF
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IJT vs YPF Fund Comparison
MetricIJTYPFCategory median
Daily−1.21%−1.65%0.16%
1 week−2.58%−0.74%0.46%
1 month−4.76%−3.69%1.10%
3 months−5.16%2.15%3.53%
6 months2.28%9.54%8.53%
YTD18.45%30.82%16.18%
1 year18.62%40.48%19.94%
3 years64.82%153.17%103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IJT vs YPF Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IJT (İş Portföy Tarım Serbest Fon) and YPF (Yapı Kredi Portföy Alfa Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, IJT leads in 2 and YPF leads in 9. IJT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YPF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IJT leads (−1.21% vs −1.65%). 1 week: YPF leads (−0.74% vs −2.58%). 1 month: YPF leads (−3.69% vs −4.76%). 3 months: YPF leads (2.15% vs −5.16%). 6 months: YPF leads (9.54% vs 2.28%). YTD: YPF leads (30.82% vs 18.45%). 1 year: YPF leads (40.48% vs 18.62%). 3 years: YPF leads (153.17% vs 64.82%). Size (TRY): YPF leads (1.1B vs 1.1B). Investors: IJT leads (1,433 vs 511). Risk: YPF leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IJT returned 18.45% and YPF returned 30.82%; over the last year IJT returned 18.62% and YPF returned 40.48%. Over the last month IJT returned −4.76% and YPF returned −3.69%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, IJT has a size of TRY 1.1B with 1,433 investors, while YPF has a size of TRY 1.1B with 511 investors. YPF leads in size and IJT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IJT is 6 out of 7 and that of YPF is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.