IHC vs PPV Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IHC (Inveo Portföy Inter Serbest Fon) and PPV (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | IHC | PPV | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.05% | 0.09% | 0.07% |
| 1 week | −3.26% | 0.67% | 0.51% |
| 1 month | 11.28% | 3.00% | 1.66% |
| 3 months | 1.04% | 9.59% | 3.04% |
| 6 months | 26.83% | 21.11% | 8.17% |
| YTD | 47.66% | 24.95% | 17.49% |
| 1 year | 53.80% | — | 21.23% |
| 3 years | 229.11% | — | 105.57% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the IHC vs PPV Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of IHC (Inveo Portföy Inter Serbest Fon) and PPV (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, IHC leads in 5 and PPV leads in 4. IHC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PPV leads (0.09% vs −0.05%). 1 week: PPV leads (0.67% vs −3.26%). 1 month: IHC leads (11.28% vs 3.00%). 3 months: PPV leads (9.59% vs 1.04%). 6 months: IHC leads (26.83% vs 21.11%). YTD: IHC leads (47.66% vs 24.95%). Size (TRY): IHC leads (366.1M vs 362.1M). Investors: IHC leads (302 vs 140). Risk: PPV leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, IHC or PPV?
Year to date IHC returned 47.66% and PPV returned 24.95%; over the last year IHC returned 53.80% and PPV returned —. Over the last month IHC returned 11.28% and PPV returned 3.00%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, IHC or PPV?
As of November 13, 2026, IHC has a size of TRY 366.1M with 302 investors, while PPV has a size of TRY 362.1M with 140 investors. IHC leads in size and IHC leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of IHC and PPV mean?
The CMB risk score of IHC is 6 out of 7 and that of PPV is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.