Yatırımcı.AI

IAM vs SPT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IAM (İş Portföy Agresif Fon Sepeti Fonu) and SPT (Aktif Portföy Katılım Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

IAMSPT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IAM vs SPT Fund Comparison
MetricIAMSPTCategory median
Daily0.15%0.64%0.39%
1 week−0.11%0.45%0.25%
1 month−2.44%−1.17%−1.05%
3 months1.66%7.37%6.44%
6 months13.91%17.23%13.81%
YTD15.91%27.57%22.40%
1 year26.36%45.07%35.81%
3 years10.12%15.82%175.03%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IAM vs SPT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IAM (İş Portföy Agresif Fon Sepeti Fonu) and SPT (Aktif Portföy Katılım Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, IAM leads in 1 and SPT leads in 10. IAM is a Fund of Funds fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SPT is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: SPT leads (0.64% vs 0.15%). 1 week: SPT leads (0.45% vs −0.11%). 1 month: SPT leads (−1.17% vs −2.44%). 3 months: SPT leads (7.37% vs 1.66%). 6 months: SPT leads (17.23% vs 13.91%). YTD: SPT leads (27.57% vs 15.91%). 1 year: SPT leads (45.07% vs 26.36%). 3 years: SPT leads (15.82% vs 10.12%). Size (TRY): SPT leads (83.5M vs 74.8M). Investors: IAM leads (2,673 vs 745). Risk: SPT leads (4 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IAM returned 15.91% and SPT returned 27.57%; over the last year IAM returned 26.36% and SPT returned 45.07%. Over the last month IAM returned −2.44% and SPT returned −1.17%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, IAM has a size of TRY 74.8M with 2,673 investors, while SPT has a size of TRY 83.5M with 745 investors. SPT leads in size and IAM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IAM is 5 out of 7 and that of SPT is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.