Yatırımcı.AI

HEA vs NZA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of HEA (Axa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Katılım Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and NZA (Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Katılım Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

HEANZA
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

HEA vs NZA Fund Comparison
MetricHEANZACategory median
Daily0.60%0.57%0.61%
1 week−1.46%−1.56%−1.51%
1 month−5.57%−5.10%−5.48%
3 months8.41%10.13%9.13%
6 months−0.87%2.62%−0.21%
YTD2.54%2.21%3.54%
1 year24.01%—26.64%
3 years279.68%—297.25%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the HEA vs NZA comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of HEA (Axa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Katılım Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and NZA (Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Katılım Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, HEA leads in 5 and NZA leads in 3. HEA is a Shariah-compliant Gold Fund fund managed by Axa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; NZA is a Shariah-compliant Gold Fund fund managed by —.

Highlights: Daily: HEA leads (0.60% vs 0.57%). 1 week: HEA leads (−1.46% vs −1.56%). 1 month: NZA leads (−5.10% vs −5.57%). 3 months: NZA leads (10.13% vs 8.41%). 6 months: NZA leads (2.62% vs −0.87%). YTD: HEA leads (2.54% vs 2.21%). Size (TRY): HEA leads (5.2B vs 1B). Investors: HEA leads (81,652 vs 6,865).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date HEA returned 2.54% and NZA returned 2.21%; over the last year HEA returned 24.01% and NZA returned —. Over the last month HEA returned −5.57% and NZA returned −5.10%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, HEA has a size of TRY 5.2B with 81,652 investors, while NZA has a size of TRY 1B with 6,865 investors. HEA leads in size and HEA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of HEA is 6 out of 7 and that of NZA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.