Yatırımcı.AI

HBN vs TJI Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of HBN (Hsbc Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and TJI (Teb Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

HBNTJI
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

HBN vs TJI Fund Comparison
MetricHBNTJICategory median
Daily0.38%0.50%0.38%
1 week0.55%0.27%0.25%
1 month0.72%−1.38%−1.05%
3 months5.63%5.00%6.44%
6 months14.27%13.53%13.81%
YTD23.37%22.37%22.40%
1 year30.03%36.09%35.81%
3 years157.73%166.79%175.03%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the HBN vs TJI comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of HBN (Hsbc Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and TJI (Teb Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, HBN leads in 8 and TJI leads in 3. HBN is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Hsbc Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TJI is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Teb Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: TJI leads (0.50% vs 0.38%). 1 week: HBN leads (0.55% vs 0.27%). 1 month: HBN leads (0.72% vs −1.38%). 3 months: HBN leads (5.63% vs 5.00%). 6 months: HBN leads (14.27% vs 13.53%). YTD: HBN leads (23.37% vs 22.37%). 1 year: TJI leads (36.09% vs 30.03%). 3 years: TJI leads (166.79% vs 157.73%). Size (TRY): HBN leads (526.1M vs 482.6M). Investors: HBN leads (1,026 vs 841). Risk: HBN leads (0 vs 4).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date HBN returned 23.37% and TJI returned 22.37%; over the last year HBN returned 30.03% and TJI returned 36.09%. Over the last month HBN returned 0.72% and TJI returned −1.38%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, HBN has a size of TRY 526.1M with 1,026 investors, while TJI has a size of TRY 482.6M with 841 investors. HBN leads in size and HBN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of HBN is 0 out of 7 and that of TJI is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.