GUK vs RPT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GUK (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Katılım Serbest Fon) and RPT (Rota Portföy İkinci Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GUK | RPT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −0.92% | −1.16% |
| Daily | −3.10% | 0.12% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | −2.81% | 0.68% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | −13.41% | 2.96% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | −3.41% | 9.17% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | −22.57% | 20.37% | 8.18% |
| YTD | −18.69% | 35.01% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | — | 45.12% | 20.69% |
| 3 years | — | 263.72% | 105.65% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GUK vs RPT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GUK (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Katılım Serbest Fon) and RPT (Rota Portföy İkinci Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GUK leads in 1 and RPT leads in 8. GUK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RPT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RPT leads (0.12% vs −3.10%). 1 week: RPT leads (0.68% vs −2.81%). 1 month: RPT leads (2.96% vs −13.41%). 3 months: RPT leads (9.17% vs −3.41%). 6 months: RPT leads (20.37% vs −22.57%). YTD: RPT leads (35.01% vs −18.69%). Size (TRY): RPT leads (1.5B vs 1.1B). Investors: GUK leads (2,316 vs 123). Risk: RPT leads (1 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GUK or RPT?
Year to date GUK returned −18.69% and RPT returned 35.01%; over the last year GUK returned — and RPT returned 45.12%. Over the last month GUK returned −13.41% and RPT returned 2.96%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GUK or RPT?
As of October 23, 2026, GUK has a size of TRY 1.1B with 2,316 investors, while RPT has a size of TRY 1.5B with 123 investors. RPT leads in size and GUK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GUK and RPT mean?
The CMB risk score of GUK is 7 out of 7 and that of RPT is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.