GUK vs KDO Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GUK (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Katılım Serbest Fon) and KDO (İş Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GUK | KDO | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −3.10% | 0.06% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | −2.81% | 0.59% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | −13.41% | 0.25% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | −3.41% | 4.31% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | −22.57% | 7.34% | 8.18% |
| YTD | −18.69% | 13.03% | 15.73% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GUK vs KDO Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GUK (Garanti Portföy Gümüş Katılım Serbest Fon) and KDO (İş Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, GUK leads in 1 and KDO leads in 7. GUK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KDO is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: KDO leads (0.06% vs −3.10%). 1 week: KDO leads (0.59% vs −2.81%). 1 month: KDO leads (0.25% vs −13.41%). 3 months: KDO leads (4.31% vs −3.41%). 6 months: KDO leads (7.34% vs −22.57%). YTD: KDO leads (13.03% vs −18.69%). Size (TRY): KDO leads (1.2B vs 1.1B). Investors: GUK leads (2,316 vs 540).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GUK or KDO?
Year to date GUK returned −18.69% and KDO returned 13.03%; over the last year GUK returned — and KDO returned —. Over the last month GUK returned −13.41% and KDO returned 0.25%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GUK or KDO?
As of October 23, 2026, GUK has a size of TRY 1.1B with 2,316 investors, while KDO has a size of TRY 1.2B with 540 investors. KDO leads in size and GUK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GUK and KDO mean?
The CMB risk score of GUK is 7 out of 7 and that of KDO is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.