Yatırımcı.AI

GRT vs PGS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GRT (Garanti Portföy Teknoloji Şirketleri Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and PGS (Azimut Portföy Pay Geri Alımı Yapan Şirketler Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.

GRTPGS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GRT vs PGS Fund Comparison
MetricGRTPGSCategory median
Today (est.)−0.67%−0.94%−0.56%
Daily−1.81%−2.71%−1.84%
1 week−5.98%−5.57%−4.21%
1 month−13.49%−8.28%−9.02%
3 months−27.24%−12.89%−10.58%
6 months−23.41%−6.40%−9.82%
YTD1.04%7.95%9.80%
1 year0.54%9.81%18.36%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Oct 22, 2026, 13:40.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GRT vs PGS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GRT (Garanti Portföy Teknoloji Şirketleri Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and PGS (Azimut Portföy Pay Geri Alımı Yapan Şirketler Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GRT leads in 3 and PGS leads in 7. GRT is a Stock Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PGS is a Stock Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Today (est.): GRT leads (−0.67% vs −0.94%). Daily: GRT leads (−1.81% vs −2.71%). 1 week: PGS leads (−5.57% vs −5.98%). 1 month: PGS leads (−8.28% vs −13.49%). 3 months: PGS leads (−12.89% vs −27.24%). 6 months: PGS leads (−6.40% vs −23.41%). YTD: PGS leads (7.95% vs 1.04%). 1 year: PGS leads (9.81% vs 0.54%). Size (TRY): PGS leads (112.1M vs 109.8M). Investors: GRT leads (1,626 vs 351).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GRT returned 1.04% and PGS returned 7.95%; over the last year GRT returned 0.54% and PGS returned 9.81%. Over the last month GRT returned −13.49% and PGS returned −8.28%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, GRT has a size of TRY 109.8M with 1,626 investors, while PGS has a size of TRY 112.1M with 351 investors. PGS leads in size and GRT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GRT is 6 out of 7 and that of PGS is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.