Yatırımcı.AI

GO6 vs PJL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GO6 (One Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PJL (Phillip Portföy Para Piyasası Fonu) side by side.

GO6PJL
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GO6 vs PJL Fund Comparison
MetricGO6PJLCategory median
Daily0.11%0.10%0.10%
1 week0.70%0.70%0.71%
1 month2.78%3.13%3.17%
3 months9.93%9.85%10.01%
6 months22.55%20.95%21.27%
YTD35.77%32.12%32.49%
1 year51.36%45.79%46.26%
3 years276.37%253.00%255.20%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GO6 vs PJL Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GO6 (One Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PJL (Phillip Portföy Para Piyasası Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GO6 leads in 9 and PJL leads in 1. GO6 is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Foneria Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PJL is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GO6 leads (0.11% vs 0.10%). 1 week: GO6 leads (0.70% vs 0.70%). 1 month: PJL leads (3.13% vs 2.78%). 3 months: GO6 leads (9.93% vs 9.85%). 6 months: GO6 leads (22.55% vs 20.95%). YTD: GO6 leads (35.77% vs 32.12%). 1 year: GO6 leads (51.36% vs 45.79%). 3 years: GO6 leads (276.37% vs 253.00%). Size (TRY): GO6 leads (1.4B vs 1.2B). Investors: GO6 leads (2,340 vs 725).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GO6 returned 35.77% and PJL returned 32.12%; over the last year GO6 returned 51.36% and PJL returned 45.79%. Over the last month GO6 returned 2.78% and PJL returned 3.13%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, GO6 has a size of TRY 1.4B with 2,340 investors, while PJL has a size of TRY 1.2B with 725 investors. GO6 leads in size and GO6 leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GO6 is 1 out of 7 and that of PJL is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.