Yatırımcı.AI

GMN vs NSK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GMN (Global MD Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and NSK (Neo Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) side by side.

GMNNSK
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GMN vs NSK Fund Comparison
MetricGMNNSKCategory median
Daily0.09%0.08%0.06%
1 week0.68%0.59%0.56%
1 month3.08%2.64%1.84%
3 months9.63%9.84%3.29%
6 months20.67%20.75%7.90%
YTD38.12%40.16%17.53%
1 year45.17%45.31%21.48%
3 years—252.51%105.66%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GMN vs NSK Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GMN (Global MD Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and NSK (Neo Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GMN leads in 5 and NSK leads in 5. GMN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NSK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GMN leads (0.09% vs 0.08%). 1 week: GMN leads (0.68% vs 0.59%). 1 month: GMN leads (3.08% vs 2.64%). 3 months: NSK leads (9.84% vs 9.63%). 6 months: NSK leads (20.75% vs 20.67%). YTD: NSK leads (40.16% vs 38.12%). 1 year: NSK leads (45.31% vs 45.17%). Size (TRY): GMN leads (47.1M vs 44.4M). Investors: NSK leads (62 vs 26). Risk: GMN leads (2 vs 3).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GMN returned 38.12% and NSK returned 40.16%; over the last year GMN returned 45.17% and NSK returned 45.31%. Over the last month GMN returned 3.08% and NSK returned 2.64%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, GMN has a size of TRY 47.1M with 26 investors, while NSK has a size of TRY 44.4M with 62 investors. GMN leads in size and NSK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GMN is 2 out of 7 and that of NSK is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.