Yatırımcı.AI

GMN vs KIH Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GMN (Global MD Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and KIH (Kare Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) side by side.

GMNKIH
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GMN vs KIH Fund Comparison
MetricGMNKIHCategory median
Daily0.10%0.09%0.05%
1 week0.74%0.61%0.44%
1 month3.09%2.61%0.38%
3 months9.88%8.54%3.95%
6 months20.76%18.54%8.45%
YTD35.36%29.51%16.06%
1 year—35.05%20.98%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GMN vs KIH Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GMN (Global MD Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and KIH (Kare Portföy İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, GMN leads in 8 and KIH leads in 0. GMN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KIH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GMN leads (0.10% vs 0.09%). 1 week: GMN leads (0.74% vs 0.61%). 1 month: GMN leads (3.09% vs 2.61%). 3 months: GMN leads (9.88% vs 8.54%). 6 months: GMN leads (20.76% vs 18.54%). YTD: GMN leads (35.36% vs 29.51%). Size (TRY): GMN leads (66.3M vs 62.9M). Investors: GMN leads (28 vs 20).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GMN returned 35.36% and KIH returned 29.51%; over the last year GMN returned — and KIH returned 35.05%. Over the last month GMN returned 3.09% and KIH returned 2.61%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, GMN has a size of TRY 66.3M with 28 investors, while KIH has a size of TRY 62.9M with 20 investors. GMN leads in size and GMN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GMN is 2 out of 7 and that of KIH is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.