GLS vs PKF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GLS (Azimut Portföy Kira Sertifikaları (Sukuk) Katılım Fonu) and PKF (Ata Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GLS | PKF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.23% | 0.53% | 0.29% |
| 1 week | 0.58% | −1.67% | 0.41% |
| 1 month | 2.97% | −4.69% | 0.20% |
| 3 months | 9.31% | 10.61% | 8.83% |
| 6 months | 19.90% | 2.50% | 16.56% |
| YTD | 30.56% | 7.62% | 27.81% |
| 1 year | 43.15% | 28.16% | 39.52% |
| 3 years | 215.10% | 281.78% | 172.10% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GLS vs PKF comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GLS (Azimut Portföy Kira Sertifikaları (Sukuk) Katılım Fonu) and PKF (Ata Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GLS leads in 7 and PKF leads in 4. GLS is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PKF is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PKF leads (0.53% vs 0.23%). 1 week: GLS leads (0.58% vs −1.67%). 1 month: GLS leads (2.97% vs −4.69%). 3 months: PKF leads (10.61% vs 9.31%). 6 months: GLS leads (19.90% vs 2.50%). YTD: GLS leads (30.56% vs 7.62%). 1 year: GLS leads (43.15% vs 28.16%). 3 years: PKF leads (281.78% vs 215.10%). Size (TRY): GLS leads (369.1M vs 367.5M). Investors: PKF leads (1,391 vs 1,382). Risk: GLS leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, GLS or PKF?
Year to date GLS returned 30.56% and PKF returned 7.62%; over the last year GLS returned 43.15% and PKF returned 28.16%. Over the last month GLS returned 2.97% and PKF returned −4.69%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GLS or PKF?
As of September 28, 2026, GLS has a size of TRY 369.1M with 1,382 investors, while PKF has a size of TRY 367.5M with 1,391 investors. GLS leads in size and PKF leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GLS and PKF mean?
The CMB risk score of GLS is 2 out of 7 and that of PKF is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.