GCK vs KTZ Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GCK (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and KTZ (Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GCK | KTZ | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.40% | 0.32% | 0.11% |
| 1 week | −0.10% | −0.01% | −0.16% |
| 1 month | −0.30% | −0.61% | 0.03% |
| 3 months | 5.18% | 4.21% | 5.71% |
| 6 months | 13.75% | 12.50% | 13.81% |
| YTD | 23.24% | 20.01% | 23.51% |
| 1 year | 33.55% | 29.53% | 34.03% |
| 3 years | 142.26% | 123.07% | 129.67% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GCK vs KTZ comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GCK (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and KTZ (Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GCK leads in 10 and KTZ leads in 1. GCK is a Shariah-compliant Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; KTZ is a Shariah-compliant Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.ş.
Highlights: Daily: GCK leads (0.40% vs 0.32%). 1 week: KTZ leads (−0.01% vs −0.10%). 1 month: GCK leads (−0.30% vs −0.61%). 3 months: GCK leads (5.18% vs 4.21%). 6 months: GCK leads (13.75% vs 12.50%). YTD: GCK leads (23.24% vs 20.01%). 1 year: GCK leads (33.55% vs 29.53%). 3 years: GCK leads (142.26% vs 123.07%). Size (TRY): GCK leads (5.7B vs 2.3B). Investors: GCK leads (747,115 vs 360,846). Risk: GCK leads (3 vs 4).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, GCK or KTZ?
Year to date GCK returned 23.24% and KTZ returned 20.01%; over the last year GCK returned 33.55% and KTZ returned 29.53%. Over the last month GCK returned −0.30% and KTZ returned −0.61%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GCK or KTZ?
As of September 28, 2026, GCK has a size of TRY 5.7B with 747,115 investors, while KTZ has a size of TRY 2.3B with 360,846 investors. GCK leads in size and GCK leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GCK and KTZ mean?
The CMB risk score of GCK is 3 out of 7 and that of KTZ is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.