Yatırımcı.AI

AYJ vs GCK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AYJ (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GCK (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

AYJGCK
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

AYJ vs GCK Fund Comparison
MetricAYJGCKCategory median
Daily0.06%0.40%0.11%
1 week−0.40%−0.10%−0.16%
1 month0.22%−0.30%0.03%
3 months6.33%5.18%5.71%
6 months13.87%13.75%13.81%
YTD23.64%23.24%23.51%
1 year35.48%33.55%34.03%
3 years129.46%142.26%129.67%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the AYJ vs GCK comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AYJ (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GCK (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AYJ leads in 5 and GCK leads in 5. AYJ is a Shariah-compliant Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; GCK is a Shariah-compliant Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GCK leads (0.40% vs 0.06%). 1 week: GCK leads (−0.10% vs −0.40%). 1 month: AYJ leads (0.22% vs −0.30%). 3 months: AYJ leads (6.33% vs 5.18%). 6 months: AYJ leads (13.87% vs 13.75%). YTD: AYJ leads (23.64% vs 23.24%). 1 year: AYJ leads (35.48% vs 33.55%). 3 years: GCK leads (142.26% vs 129.46%). Size (TRY): GCK leads (5.7B vs 2.6B). Investors: GCK leads (747,115 vs 453,891).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date AYJ returned 23.64% and GCK returned 23.24%; over the last year AYJ returned 35.48% and GCK returned 33.55%. Over the last month AYJ returned 0.22% and GCK returned −0.30%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, AYJ has a size of TRY 2.6B with 453,891 investors, while GCK has a size of TRY 5.7B with 747,115 investors. GCK leads in size and GCK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AYJ is 3 out of 7 and that of GCK is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.