Yatırımcı.AI

GBZ vs OVD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GBZ (Azimut Portföy Emtia Fon Sepeti Fonu) and OVD (QNB Portföy Emtia Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

GBZOVD
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GBZ vs OVD Fund Comparison
MetricGBZOVDCategory median
Daily−1.16%−0.26%−1.16%
1 week−0.73%−0.23%−1.71%
1 month−3.76%−0.08%−3.74%
3 months4.89%9.55%−0.11%
6 months3.19%14.24%2.89%
YTD27.05%38.61%18.90%
1 year35.20%51.12%28.75%
3 years135.83%153.16%162.51%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GBZ vs OVD Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GBZ (Azimut Portföy Emtia Fon Sepeti Fonu) and OVD (QNB Portföy Emtia Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GBZ leads in 1 and OVD leads in 9. GBZ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; OVD is a Fund of Funds fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: OVD leads (−0.26% vs −1.16%). 1 week: OVD leads (−0.23% vs −0.73%). 1 month: OVD leads (−0.08% vs −3.76%). 3 months: OVD leads (9.55% vs 4.89%). 6 months: OVD leads (14.24% vs 3.19%). YTD: OVD leads (38.61% vs 27.05%). 1 year: OVD leads (51.12% vs 35.20%). 3 years: OVD leads (153.16% vs 135.83%). Size (TRY): GBZ leads (874M vs 776.3M). Investors: OVD leads (2,944 vs 2,703).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GBZ returned 27.05% and OVD returned 38.61%; over the last year GBZ returned 35.20% and OVD returned 51.12%. Over the last month GBZ returned −3.76% and OVD returned −0.08%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, GBZ has a size of TRY 874M with 2,703 investors, while OVD has a size of TRY 776.3M with 2,944 investors. GBZ leads in size and OVD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GBZ is 6 out of 7 and that of OVD is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.