GBV vs GMA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GBV (Garanti Portföy Blockchain Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and GMA (Azimut Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GBV | GMA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −2.14% | −2.06% |
| Daily | 0.98% | −0.78% | −0.41% |
| 1 week | −2.33% | −1.83% | −1.69% |
| 1 month | −8.19% | −2.71% | −3.34% |
| 3 months | −1.95% | 2.12% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | 12.35% | 11.41% | 4.10% |
| YTD | 32.99% | 29.35% | 21.58% |
| 1 year | 32.05% | 40.29% | 30.90% |
| 3 years | 366.76% | 157.30% | 160.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GBV vs GMA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GBV (Garanti Portföy Blockchain Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and GMA (Azimut Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GBV leads in 5 and GMA leads in 6. GBV is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GMA is a Variable Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GBV leads (0.98% vs −0.78%). 1 week: GMA leads (−1.83% vs −2.33%). 1 month: GMA leads (−2.71% vs −8.19%). 3 months: GMA leads (2.12% vs −1.95%). 6 months: GBV leads (12.35% vs 11.41%). YTD: GBV leads (32.99% vs 29.35%). 1 year: GMA leads (40.29% vs 32.05%). 3 years: GBV leads (366.76% vs 157.30%). Size (TRY): GMA leads (2B vs 1.9B). Investors: GBV leads (19,808 vs 1,323). Risk: GMA leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GBV or GMA?
Year to date GBV returned 32.99% and GMA returned 29.35%; over the last year GBV returned 32.05% and GMA returned 40.29%. Over the last month GBV returned −8.19% and GMA returned −2.71%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GBV or GMA?
As of October 22, 2026, GBV has a size of TRY 1.9B with 19,808 investors, while GMA has a size of TRY 2B with 1,323 investors. GMA leads in size and GBV leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GBV and GMA mean?
The CMB risk score of GBV is 6 out of 7 and that of GMA is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.