GBC vs ZLH Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GBC (Azimut Portföy Yabancı Hisse Senedi Fonu) and ZLH (Ziraat Portföy BIST 100-30 Şirketleri Hisse Senedi Fonu ( Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GBC | ZLH | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.64% | 1.28% | 1.08% |
| 1 week | −0.03% | −0.66% | 2.86% |
| 1 month | −6.56% | −8.17% | −3.07% |
| 3 months | −3.60% | −16.17% | −8.78% |
| 6 months | 3.06% | −19.77% | −11.88% |
| YTD | 21.97% | −5.25% | 11.07% |
| 1 year | 21.32% | 3.01% | 18.62% |
| 3 years | 150.92% | 45.84% | 90.23% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GBC vs ZLH Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GBC (Azimut Portföy Yabancı Hisse Senedi Fonu) and ZLH (Ziraat Portföy BIST 100-30 Şirketleri Hisse Senedi Fonu ( Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GBC leads in 8 and ZLH leads in 2. GBC is a Stock Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZLH is a Stock Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: ZLH leads (1.28% vs −0.64%). 1 week: GBC leads (−0.03% vs −0.66%). 1 month: GBC leads (−6.56% vs −8.17%). 3 months: GBC leads (−3.60% vs −16.17%). 6 months: GBC leads (3.06% vs −19.77%). YTD: GBC leads (21.97% vs −5.25%). 1 year: GBC leads (21.32% vs 3.01%). 3 years: GBC leads (150.92% vs 45.84%). Size (TRY): GBC leads (374.9M vs 371.5M). Investors: ZLH leads (3,212 vs 1,469).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GBC or ZLH?
Year to date GBC returned 21.97% and ZLH returned −5.25%; over the last year GBC returned 21.32% and ZLH returned 3.01%. Over the last month GBC returned −6.56% and ZLH returned −8.17%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GBC or ZLH?
As of November 13, 2026, GBC has a size of TRY 374.9M with 1,469 investors, while ZLH has a size of TRY 371.5M with 3,212 investors. GBC leads in size and ZLH leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GBC and ZLH mean?
The CMB risk score of GBC is 6 out of 7 and that of ZLH is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.