Yatırımcı.AI

FTL vs TPZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FTL (One Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) and TPZ (Teb Portföy Kira Sertifikaları (Döviz) Katılım Fonu) side by side.

FTLTPZ
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FTL vs TPZ Fund Comparison
MetricFTLTPZCategory median
Daily0.30%0.08%0.29%
1 week0.69%0.27%0.41%
1 month3.13%1.38%0.20%
3 months9.85%5.65%8.83%
6 months21.24%13.11%16.56%
YTD31.78%17.22%27.81%
1 year45.31%24.03%39.52%
3 years—128.10%172.10%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FTL vs TPZ comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FTL (One Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) and TPZ (Teb Portföy Kira Sertifikaları (Döviz) Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FTL leads in 9 and TPZ leads in 1. FTL is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Foneria Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TPZ is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Teb Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FTL leads (0.30% vs 0.08%). 1 week: FTL leads (0.69% vs 0.27%). 1 month: FTL leads (3.13% vs 1.38%). 3 months: FTL leads (9.85% vs 5.65%). 6 months: FTL leads (21.24% vs 13.11%). YTD: FTL leads (31.78% vs 17.22%). 1 year: FTL leads (45.31% vs 24.03%). Size (TRY): FTL leads (160M vs 150M). Investors: TPZ leads (1,430 vs 574). Risk: FTL leads (1 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FTL returned 31.78% and TPZ returned 17.22%; over the last year FTL returned 45.31% and TPZ returned 24.03%. Over the last month FTL returned 3.13% and TPZ returned 1.38%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FTL has a size of TRY 160M with 574 investors, while TPZ has a size of TRY 150M with 1,430 investors. FTL leads in size and TPZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FTL is 1 out of 7 and that of TPZ is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.