FSH vs IHC Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FSH (Fiba Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) and IHC (Inveo Portföy Inter Serbest Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | FSH | IHC | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.82% | −0.27% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | 2.38% | −0.87% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | 2.50% | −5.94% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 6.99% | 1.99% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 42.14% | 30.33% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 39.09% | 36.75% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 48.45% | 40.53% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | 271.33% | 201.47% | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the FSH vs IHC comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FSH (Fiba Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) and IHC (Inveo Portföy Inter Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FSH leads in 9 and IHC leads in 1. FSH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IHC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FSH leads (0.82% vs −0.27%). 1 week: FSH leads (2.38% vs −0.87%). 1 month: FSH leads (2.50% vs −5.94%). 3 months: FSH leads (6.99% vs 1.99%). 6 months: FSH leads (42.14% vs 30.33%). YTD: FSH leads (39.09% vs 36.75%). 1 year: FSH leads (48.45% vs 40.53%). 3 years: FSH leads (271.33% vs 201.47%). Size (TRY): IHC leads (374.5M vs 372M). Investors: FSH leads (478 vs 364).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, FSH or IHC?
Year to date FSH returned 39.09% and IHC returned 36.75%; over the last year FSH returned 48.45% and IHC returned 40.53%. Over the last month FSH returned 2.50% and IHC returned −5.94%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FSH or IHC?
As of September 28, 2026, FSH has a size of TRY 372M with 478 investors, while IHC has a size of TRY 374.5M with 364 investors. IHC leads in size and FSH leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FSH and IHC mean?
The CMB risk score of FSH is 6 out of 7 and that of IHC is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.