Yatırımcı.AI

FPG vs KRT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FPG (Fiba Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and KRT (Kare Portföy Türkiye Odaklı Serbest (Döviz ) Fon) side by side.

FPGKRT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FPG vs KRT Fund Comparison
MetricFPGKRTCategory median
Daily−3.55%0.00%−0.07%
1 week−7.10%−0.10%−0.29%
1 month−8.79%1.06%0.00%
3 months10.66%5.39%4.33%
6 months−3.41%12.50%11.90%
YTD−9.02%16.31%14.97%
1 year49.00%21.78%21.27%
3 years—115.87%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FPG vs KRT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FPG (Fiba Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and KRT (Kare Portföy Türkiye Odaklı Serbest (Döviz ) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FPG leads in 4 and KRT leads in 6. FPG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KRT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KRT leads (0.00% vs −3.55%). 1 week: KRT leads (−0.10% vs −7.10%). 1 month: KRT leads (1.06% vs −8.79%). 3 months: FPG leads (10.66% vs 5.39%). 6 months: KRT leads (12.50% vs −3.41%). YTD: KRT leads (16.31% vs −9.02%). 1 year: FPG leads (49.00% vs 21.78%). Size (TRY): FPG leads (749.3M vs 742.3M). Investors: FPG leads (1,897 vs 136). Risk: KRT leads (3 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FPG returned −9.02% and KRT returned 16.31%; over the last year FPG returned 49.00% and KRT returned 21.78%. Over the last month FPG returned −8.79% and KRT returned 1.06%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, FPG has a size of TRY 749.3M with 1,897 investors, while KRT has a size of TRY 742.3M with 136 investors. FPG leads in size and FPG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FPG is 6 out of 7 and that of KRT is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.