Yatırımcı.AI

FMG vs PKT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FMG (QNB Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

FMGPKT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FMG vs PKT Fund Comparison
MetricFMGPKTCategory median
Daily−0.10%0.10%0.05%
1 week−3.75%0.69%0.44%
1 month−11.91%3.05%0.38%
3 months0.82%9.90%3.95%
6 months−20.62%21.33%8.45%
YTD−13.00%35.89%16.06%
1 year34.59%46.14%20.98%
3 years38.30%—107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FMG vs PKT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FMG (QNB Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FMG leads in 2 and PKT leads in 8. FMG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PKT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PKT leads (0.10% vs −0.10%). 1 week: PKT leads (0.69% vs −3.75%). 1 month: PKT leads (3.05% vs −11.91%). 3 months: PKT leads (9.90% vs 0.82%). 6 months: PKT leads (21.33% vs −20.62%). YTD: PKT leads (35.89% vs −13.00%). 1 year: PKT leads (46.14% vs 34.59%). Size (TRY): FMG leads (10.5B vs 10.2B). Investors: FMG leads (9,282 vs 1,543). Risk: PKT leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FMG returned −13.00% and PKT returned 35.89%; over the last year FMG returned 34.59% and PKT returned 46.14%. Over the last month FMG returned −11.91% and PKT returned 3.05%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, FMG has a size of TRY 10.5B with 9,282 investors, while PKT has a size of TRY 10.2B with 1,543 investors. FMG leads in size and FMG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FMG is 6 out of 7 and that of PKT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.